In the appended author’s note, Rice
gives a brief overview of her relationship to the Roman Catholic Church from
birth to today, and she explains the research that she did to write this book
about the first thirteen years of Jesus’ life.
And she has done a great deal of research on all sides of the
fence: she read the biblical text,
scholarly works on the dating and authorship of the texts – and, interestingly,
concludes that the historical critical late-dating of the texts is spurious,
historians like Josephus and Philo, the Gnostic writings, and modern
theologians of all stripes. She has put
her work in.
What she comes up with is a very
readable and compelling account of Jesus’ first thirteen years. There were times as I was reading, I could
feel grit in my clothes, and there are comments and turns of phrases which show
she knows what the period was like.
In these things, this is an excellent
novel. However, I am concerned that some
will read this, not as a novel, but as history.
Thankfully, she does not put this forward as history (as Dan Brown does
his novels). However, it is confusing to
read her putting forth both a traditional/conservative biblical reading of the
biblical texts while combining them with the Gnostic texts (which she finds,
for some unwritten reason, “compelling”).
This makes for some historical curiosities: on the one hand, she asserts that Jesus was
born of a virgin, on the other, she says He has older siblings. She asserts the Jewish understanding of
Christ the Lord, but then presents Him as not knowing Who He is, and sinning –
capriciously using His “abilities” to raise the dead, kill His childhood
friends, and create living animals out of clay.
This is a well-written and enjoyable
novel. It makes me all the more
interested in hearing Rice’s longer confession of her faith. However, I would be careful who I would
recommend this novel to, and I certainly would not give it to someone who wants
to know Who Jesus is – the Real, Historical, Biblical Jesus, that is.
No comments:
Post a Comment