Trueman says, “The origins of this
book lie in my curiosity about how and why a particular statement has come to
be regarded as coherent and meaningful: ‘I am a woman trapped in a man’s body’”
(19).
Trueman argues that this can only be
understood in understanding how we have come to our current understanding of “human
selfhood” (20).
In the first part of the book,
Trueman examines the concepts which he will look at historically in the second
section of the book. In the second
section, beginning with the philosophy of Rousseau, Trueman plots the course of
how our understand of self has changed.
In the third section, Trueman deals with “the sexualizing of psychology
and the politicizing of sex.” Finally,
he looks at several contemporary issues and how they might be addressed (26-29).
Trueman argues that removing any
sense of foundation -- or objective reality -- has led to the enshrinement of
feelings and the codifying of one’s actions as one’s being (cf. 102). Such thought leaves reality – and the meaning
of “self” like a boat without a rudder.
To put a beginning to this change, Trueman
looks to Rousseau (107). Rousseau argues that humans are born good and ethical
but are corrupted by society. In other
words, what we feel is reality above and beyond any societal norm (123). “Ethically speaking, taste becomes truth” (161). Trueman traces the development of these
beliefs through various writers up to the modern day.
One outgrowth of this thinking is
that sexuality is now considered identity (202). Sexuality has been moved out
of the sphere of morality. And anyone
who argues against one feeling their way into sexual identity is put down by coercion
of the government – in one way or another (253). See the politicization of sexuality in our current
political dialogue.
Trueman looks at how this is seen in
the triumph of the erotic, the therapeutic, the transgender movement, and the revolution
of the self.
The separation of gender from sex, Trueman
argues, definitionally does away with them both – definition is subjective, and
ultimately meaningless (373).
Trueman says, “this book is neither
a lament nor a polemic. It is rather an
attempt to explain how the revolution of the self came to take the form it has
in the West and why that is so culturally significant” (382).
Trueman concludes with thoughts for
the Church:
1. We need to seriously reflect on
the connection between aesthetics and our beliefs and practices (402).
2. We must be a true community (404).
3. We need to have a high view of
natural law and the physical body (405).
The book has a lengthy index.
This is an in-depth examination of
the understanding of self today, how we got here, and what it means for us and
our future – and the Church. What I have
written is only a glimpse into this work – one anyone interested in understanding
the issues of the day in education, politics,
[This review appears on my blog, Amazon.com, and
Goodreads.com.]
No comments:
Post a Comment